Validated polygenic risk, calibrated across ancestries.

ARC-OMIX coronary heart disease scores are validated in two ancestrally varied U.S. cohorts that include European-, African-, and Hispanic/Latino-ancestry participants. Validation for the other ARC-PREVENT conditions is in progress.

19,348
eMERGE IV
Primary validation cohort · U.S. multi-site
239,645
All of Us
Prospective replication cohort · U.S. NIH
3
Ancestry clusters reported
European, African, Hispanic/Latino
Validation — Coronary heart disease

Polygenic risk and family history are independently and additively informative.

The C-statistic of the Pooled Cohort Equations rises from 0.719 to 0.753 when polygenic risk and family history are added together.

C-statistic · eMERGE IV (n=19,348)
Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE)0.719PCE + Polygenic Risk Score0.735 +0.016PCE + PRS + Family History0.753 +0.0340.700.720.740.760.78
Reclassification at 7.5% 10-year threshold
PCE + PRS
Up 3.5% · Down 4.7%
PCE + PRS + Family History
Up 4.6% · Down 14.1%

Net benefit: ~4 additional true positives per 1,000 screened at the 7.5% threshold. In adults <40 yr, c-statistic rises from 0.757 to 0.827.

Additive CHD hazard ratio · All of Us (n=239,645)
Neither high PRS nor positive FamHxHR 1.00High PRS only (top 5%)HR 1.85Positive family history onlyHR 1.78High PRS + positive family historyHR 3.791×2×3×4×5×
CLINICAL INTERPRETATION

PRS and family history capture partially non-overlapping genetic risk. A patient with both carries nearly 4× the baseline risk — a signal that standard clinical assessments miss.

Top 5% PRS threshold. Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, 5 PCs; 95% CIs shown.

Trained and validated across large, ancestrally varied populations.

Training data sourcesValidation cohorts
0Bar width is drawn to scale by participants (about 2 million in total)≈ 1.98M
~500kUK BiobankUK · Training data source
~520kFinnGenFinland · Training data source
~650kMVPU.S. Veterans · Training data source
~50kPAGEMulti-ancestry · Training data source
239,645All of UsU.S. NIH · Prospective replication cohort
19,348eMERGE IVU.S. multi-site · Primary validation cohort

MI-GENES: ten years of follow-up.

In the MI-GENES randomized trial, adults at intermediate coronary risk whose risk estimate included a polygenic risk score started statins more often and had lower LDL cholesterol at six months than those given a conventional score alone. In a post hoc ten-year follow-up (Naderian et al., Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, 2025; listed under Publications below), the polygenic-risk group had fewer major adverse cardiovascular events: 2 versus 9 (hazard ratio 0.20, 95% CI 0.04–0.94). The trial was small (n=203), so the estimate is imprecise, but it suggests genetic risk information can support durable clinical decisions, not just a one-time result.

Publications

2026

Clinical use of polygenic risk scores: current status, barriers and future directions

Kullo IJ.

Nature Reviews Genetics · 2026

View on PubMed →

2025

Effect of disclosing a polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease on adverse cardiovascular events

Naderian M, Hamed ME, Vaseem AA, …, Kullo IJ.

Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine · 2025

View on PubMed →

2024

Associations of self-reported race, social determinants of health, and polygenic risk with coronary heart disease

Norland K, Schaid DJ, Naderian M, Na J, Kullo IJ.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024

View on PubMed →

2022

Polygenic risk score for peripheral artery disease

Kullo IJ.

Vascular Medicine · 2022

View on PubMed →

2016

Incorporating a genetic risk score into coronary heart disease risk estimates: effect on LDL cholesterol levels

Kullo IJ, Jouni H, Austin EE, et al.

Circulation · 2016

View on PubMed →